Conclusion

This UNSDG project fundamentally shifted my understanding of both collaborative work and my own capabilities. Most surprising was how seamlessly our group functioned—tasks were completed efficiently, and collaboration felt natural rather than forced. This starkly contrasted with previous negative experiences, revealing that group work quality depends heavily on communication structures and mutual respect rather than being inherently problematic. 

 

Personally, I developed a sense of value within the team. My opinions were genuinely considered rather than dismissed, teaching me that contributing meaningfully to discussions requires both courage to voice thoughts and a receptive team environment. This experience strengthened my ability to articulate ideas clearly and confidently, particularly when explaining complex scientific concepts like eutrophication processes to non-specialist audiences. 

 

I discovered that structured scheduling dramatically enhances my productivity. With clear meeting deadlines and defined goals, I completed work efficiently and effectively—a revelation about my working style that will inform future academic endeavours. Perhaps most importantly, I learned to advocate for myself. Previously, I might have remained silent to avoid seeming "difficult," but this project demonstrated that speaking up about concerns directly impacts my academic outcomes and is entirely appropriate. 

 

Beyond personal development, researching SDG 14.1 heightened my awareness of the severity and urgency of global environmental challenges. Understanding coastal eutrophication and marine plastic pollution quantitatively made these abstract concepts tangible and alarming. Moving forward, I carry enhanced communication skills, effective time management strategies, self-advocacy confidence, and a deepened commitment to environmental sustainability—all invaluable assets for my ongoing academic journey and future career in science.